I also played for you a Jeff Greenfield sound bite from CNN, where he compares Kerry’s speech to Clinton (which I didn’t hear) and also says that Kerry is ‘striking general election themes.’ That’s mainstream press code language for moving to the center.
But, if he’s already beginning to run a mainstream general election campaign, my friends, code lingo for moving to the center, are the nation’s liberals going to want to hear that? They haven’t cared about any of that; they haven’t even been listening to Kerry on issues. There’s not a one of these voters that can tell you one thing Kerry stands for because it hasn’t mattered. All they’re voting for is somebody that they think can beat Bush. If he’s already going to start moving to the center, you’re going to have a bunch of liberals who think they have been scammed. Once these Democrats get over the Christmas-morning rush of opening their presents with the guy they think can beat Bush, the cavalry is going to fight back here, and there are going to be some things about Kerry these people don’t know yet.
In the audio link below, I read heavily from a piece by William Saletan at Slate.com, headlined, “Kerried Away.” Part of Saleten’s point is that Kerry is not actually more electable than John Edwards, but that Democrats have glommed onto Kerry, because he won a few primaries. What he’s setting up here is that Democrats may be nominating the wrong guy in terms of real electability, based on who’s got the broader appeal elsewhere. It’s really Edwards. They’re going with Kerry simply because Kerry has demonstrated he can win, they think, because he’s won a couple of early Democrat primaries.
That’s what’s at stake here. And you know, it may well be that John Edwards is the worst thing that could have ever happened to Hillary Clinton, too, because before all this is said and done, John Edwards may be the preferred nominee next time around, not Hillary.